
Celebrating the Class of 2025
The ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ proudly honors 353 graduates as they prepare for what’s ahead and for the good that they will do.
Phone: 543-0600
Email: feldmanj@uw.edu
B.S., with Honors, Northeastern University J.D., Northeastern University
Civil Procedure — Trial and Appellate Practice — Constitutional Law — Criminal Law and Procedure — Antitrust and Class Action Litigation
Course Number | Course Name |
---|---|
Civil Procedure I |
|
Constitutional Law II |
|
Civil Procedure II |
|
Ninth Circuit Appellate Advocacy Clinic |
See the full list under the Publications tab below.
Jeff Feldman teaches in the areas of constitutional law, civil procedure, trial practice, and appellate advocacy. He also serves as the co-director of the law school’s Ninth Circuit Appellate Advocacy Clinic and as the Faculty Director of the law school’s Judicial Clerkship Program. Before joining the faculty, he had a long career as a trial and appellate lawyer, and he continues to handle trial and appellate matters in Washington and Alaska.
Professor Feldman received the Philip A. Trautman Professor of the Year Award in 2019, 2021, 2023, and 2024, and the Dean’s Medal in 2025. He is the past recipient of the ACLU's Hero of Constitutional Rights Award, the Alaska Bar Association's Professionalism Award, and he twice received the U.S. District Court's Public Service Award. He received the Alaska Bar Association's Human Rights Award for a decade of pro bono work on a death penalty case in Texas.
Professor Feldman is a fellow of the American Academy of Appellate Lawyers, a member of the American Law Institute, and a fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers. He served for 12 years as Chair and Member of the Alaska Commission on Judicial Conduct, and as a member of the Board of Governors and as President of the Alaska Bar Association. He obtained his B.A. (with honors) and J.D. degrees from Northeastern University and served as a law clerk to Alaska Supreme Court Justice Edmond W. Burke.
Professor Feldman has tried more than 100 cases and argued more than 125 appeals in state and federal courts involving a wide range of issues including the constitutionality of restrictions on reproductive freedom [Perdue v. Planned Parenthood of Alaska; Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest v. State of Alaska]; constitutionality of proposed ballot initiatives [Northwest Cruise Ship Ass'n., Inc. v. State of Alaska; State of Alaska v. Trust the People Initiative Committee]; class action requirements [Turner v. ACS;ÌýReese v. Malone]; punitive damages [Ace v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.; Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Fisher]; immigration asylum rights [J.R. v. Barr]; civil rights claims [Hogan v. von Raab; Spencer v. Pew]; state leasing of natural resources [Baxley v. State of Alaska and BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc.]; Native American law [Center for Biological Diversity v. Kempthorne]; legislative redistricting [In re: Redistricting Cases]; antitrust law [Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.]; issues of criminal procedure and evidence [Linehan v. State; Farleigh v. Municipality of Anchorage; Arnold v. State; Reynolds v. State; State v. Serdahely;ÌýandÌýPlas v. State]; issues of civil procedure [Hunter v. Phillip Morris USA; Sampson v. Alaska Airlines]; and imposition of the death penalty on an intellectually disabled offender [Chester v. Thaler].
Jeff Feldman, a professor at the ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ, wrote via email: "That language, on its face, would not eliminate the court's ability to enforce contempt charges against the government. It would make it much more difficult, though." He also noted that he had not reviewed the entirety of the legislation (which is more than 1,000 pages long), and there could be language or other provisions within the bill that impact the meaning or provide context for the language of the provision in question.
Feldman, now a law professor at the University of Washington, said 81% of Gleason’s decisions are upheld on appeal, a slightly higher rate than other federal judges who have served in Alaska. Feldman considers Sullivan a friend. He said that while it’s fair to criticize specific judicial decisions, it’s inappropriate to “throw rocks at a judge” by alleging a bias that doesn’t exist. “When a leader makes that kind of allegation, that suggests that a judge's rulings are both wrong and politically motivated, that undermines faith and confidence in the judiciary,” Feldman said.
Sen. Dan Sullivan's criticism of a federal judge shines a spotlight on the judicial selection process. Professor Feldman is quoted.
“It’s undeniable that the order targets a specific community of individuals and is being challenged on that basis,” UW law professor Jeff Feldman said in an email. “The law is still evolving in this area, but the extensive body of anti-discrimination and equal protection law that has been developed over the past 70 years, if applied faithfully to the trans community, almost certainly would result in the president’s executive order being deemed unconstitutional.”
This unfavorable view may stem from the belief that the Supreme Court’s rulings are rooted in the justices’ political biases, Feldman said. “That view may not be entirely wrong,” he said, “but it misses the fact that individuals who are appointed to the court arrive with differing views of legal philosophy, of application of the tools of judicial and constitutional interpretation, and of how history and precedent should be read and applied.”
"It's very doubtful that the president has the power to ban paper straws. Paper straws do not constitute a public health hazard and, even if they did, banning them would require engaging a rule making process under the Administrative Procedures Act, which is lengthy and unlikely to result in a ban."
“I’ve been practicing for close to 50 years and have handled antitrust, securities fraud, class actions, and other cases that generally would fall into the category of ‘cases that take more time than usual,’” said University of Washington law professor Jeff Feldman, in an email. “I’ve never had a case that came anywhere close to six years of discovery.”
For example, a large company might overcharge a million people an extra $5 for their purchases. It’s unlikely that anyone would sue the company over $5, but collectively, the business stole $5 million from its customers – more than enough to justify a lawsuit, says Jeff Feldman, professor from practice at the ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ.
"Whoever made the decision at Starbucks, I would guess, aimed at finding literally the best appellate lawyer in America they could retain," said Jeff Feldman, the co-director of the Ninth Circuit Appellate Advocacy Clinic at the ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ. "I suspect that was the goal, and that's what they did."
“Many judges would not be happy that a deposition was taken at which both sides were not present,” said Jeff Feldman, a ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ professor who teaches civil procedure. “It appears that this all could have been avoided.”
“Regardless of how the cases are resolved — guilty, innocent, or hung jury — people are more likely to trust the process and the outcomes if they’ve had access to and seen the evidence, seen the witnesses testify, and heard the arguments,” Feldman said.
Feldman noted the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment protects an individual’s right to remain silent and not disclose information that would be incriminating. But he said he thinks most courts would conclude that exercising the privilege of a driver’s license implies a waiver of that Fifth Amendment protection. “In other words, you don’t get a driver’s license unless you agree to abide by laws in the state, one of which requires that you stop and provide information following an accident,” Feldman said in an email to The Columbian.
Class-action waivers have become widespread in recent years, including airlines, ride-hailing apps, cellphone carriers and workplaces, as businesses increasingly take steps to “try and protect” themselves from class-action lawsuits, said Jeff Feldman, a University of Washington law professor and attorney who has defended against class-action lawsuits.
Jeffrey Feldman, a professor from practice at the ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ, said his arrest could happen in a couple of ways.
It was a classic Nike ad — a celebration of women and sports in conjunction with International Women’s Day that was so inspiring and beautifully shot it could bring tears to your eyes. “One day, we won’t need a day to celebrate how far we’ve come,” a young female narrator states in the voice-over. “We won’t need a day to prove we’re just as strong and fast and skilled.” The 2021 campaign made no mention of the fact that a group of women employees were suing the company, alleging widespread sex discrimination, harassment and an $11,000-per-year gender pay gap. It didn’t say that for three years Nike had been waging a fierce courtroom fight to keep a trove of internal documents under seal and out of the public eye. Jeff Feldman, professor of law at the UW, is quoted.
Jeff Feldman, a University of Washington law professor and expert in civil procedure, said he’s never heard of a discovery process taking as long as in the Nike case – approaching five years now.
“If the recent reports are true, President Biden’s lawyers promptly reported and returned the classified documents that they found to the National Archives. That conduct is not consistent with an intent to retain the documents,” said Jeff Feldman, a professor from practice at the ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ. “By contrast, President Trump held onto the documents, refused to return them, and alternately claimed that the documents were his, and not the government’s, and that they weren’t classified because he deemed them unclassified when he removed them.
Pierce County Sheriff Ed Troyer soon will be back in court in connection with his 2021 report that a newspaper carrier threatened to kill him and the massive police response that ensued. Experts say his acquittal on criminal charges earlier this month will have little, if any, bearing on the unresolved civil lawsuit pending against him and the county in U.S. District Court. Jeff Feldman, professor of law at the UW, is quoted.
A new lawsuit threatens to upend a landmark revenue-sharing pact that’s guided the distribution of more than $2 billion in natural resources among Alaska’s Native corporations. The litigation stems from a 1982 deal that outlined how 12 regional Native corporations should share income from exploiting resources like forests, but not what should happen with money earned by preserving them. Jeff Feldman, professor of law at the UW, is referenced.
Jeff Feldman, a law professor at the University of Washington, told Law360 in an interview Monday that he hired Rikelman to work at his now-defunct firm, Feldman & Orlansky, in Alaska in the early 2000s, even though the firm wasn't hiring at the time.
Jeff Feldman, professor of law at the UW, joins "New Day Northwest" to talk about what's next for our state and the country after the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
Do U.S. government laws say no American can own a house or car and that all children are wards of the state? No, that's not true. Jeff Feldman, professor of law at the UW, is quoted.
After living under British rule, the U.S. had “a very strong and healthy distrust of power, authoritative power,” said Jeff Feldman, a professor at the ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ. The states understood the necessity of a central government, but didn’t want to cede too much autonomy to create it.
In den USA zeichnet sich ein Paradigmenwechsel ab. Die geplante Kartellrechtsreform könnte die Tech-Konzerne zu Fall bringen. (The United States is about to face a paradigm shift. Planned proposals for an overhaul of existing antitrust laws could see Big Tech stumbling.)
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission — not the Department of Justice — is expected to lead the investigation into Amazon’s proposed $8.5 billion purchase of MGM Studios, according to a source familiar with the situation. Jeff Feldman, professor of law at the UW, is quoted.
Jeff Feldman, professor of law at the UW, is interviewed on “KIRO Nights” about the Supreme Court rulings on President Trump’s financial records. [Segment begins at 6:30.]
Jeff Feldman, professor of law at the UW, is interviewed about whether state government has the authority to make requirements of citizens, like wearing masks.
Due to a legal principle called qualified immunity, the bar to hold police accountable for violence or even killing a civilian is quite high. Jeff Feldman is a professor at the ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ; he joined Ross Reynolds to discuss the history of how police have been shielded from liability.
The ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ proudly honors 353 graduates as they prepare for what’s ahead and for the good that they will do.
A ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ classroom became a live courtroom on Nov. 20 when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral arguments on three cases.
Faculty organized an expert panel to discuss topics including developments in the federal courts and the Supreme Court, LGBTQ+ rights, environmental policy and immigration.
Walker McKusick, J.D. ‘24, and Sally Walker, J.D. ’24, reflect on their transformative journey through the Ninth Circuit Pro Bono Appellate Advocacy Clinic.
Professors Feldman, Manheim, Lombardi and Porter tackled a SCOTUS case involving former president Trump before a packed audience on Feb. 4.
Stay informed about the latest updates and successes from ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ's Clinical Law Program, which provides students with real-world legal experience assisting clients and communities.
In three minutes, Jeff Feldman, professor from practice at ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ, gives a tutorial on class action lawsuits.